Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,819 |
| Posted: | | | | I would like the runtime to be exact.
Currently I put the exact runtime in the Notes section. That way I don't have to dig the disc out every time someone tries to change the runtime to what the cover states. |
|
Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | I was tempted to post this one myself a couple of weeks ago. I know in the short term this one probably wont be popular, having to resubmit practically every entry in the database. However I would like to see it implemented so we can more accurately profile our collections. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | I am always for more accurate information... even if it does come with basically every profile having to be updated. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: March 17, 2007 | Posts: 853 |
| Posted: | | | | Do we really care a movie is 1:46:31. I mean have you ever sat back and said, "Damn I can't watch this DVD it is 31 seconds longer than I have time for." I know is for information and archiving purposes, I still don't see a need. If we are going to add the seconds where will it stop? Do we include the milliseconds or the nanoseconds? Lets just do it down to Planck's time which is 5.4 x 10^-44 seconds. or 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000054 seconds. Yes I know this is an extreme, it is supposed to be. I think down to the minute is plenty anymore and we are just adding unnecessary work for ourselves. |
|
Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | Pretty much any DVD player (software, standalone, etc...) allows you to see the total runtime in hours, minutes & seconds so we should be able to enter that information. I'm also fairly confident that they will run to exact seconds so there's no need to go further. It's not just about adding in seconds where we currently round down, it's also about taking them off when we round up. If a film is 1:52:31 we enter it as 1:53 even though it's quite some way away from that time. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,217 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Lord Of The Sith: Quote: If we are going to add the seconds where will it stop? Movies usually have 24 frames per seconds, so we should be contend with x/24th of a second. cya, Mithi (intoxicated) | | | Mithi's little XSLT tinkering - the power of XML --- DVD-Profiler Mini-Wiki |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | I would also like to s Ken come up with a way to deal with the multiple runtimes which we see with some of the multi-version films.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Forget_the_Rest: Quote: If a film is 1:52:31 we enter it as 1:53 even though it's quite some way away from that time. I don't believe I have ever heard 29 seconds refered to as being 'quite some away from' a specific time. As to the original request...rounding to the nearest minute is more than adequate. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar | | | Last edited: by TheMadMartian |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,394 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: I don't believe I have ever heard 29 seconds refered to as being 'quite some away from' a specific time.
As to the original request...rounding to the nearest minute is more than adequate. I agree with both statements, Unicus. Since the field in Profiler is in minutes, we have only two choices: (1) round to the nearest minute or (2) truncate all "remaining" seconds. Rounding is clearly the more accurate of those two choices. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole) Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges. DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 | | | Last edited: by kdh1949 |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,819 |
| Posted: | | | | Clearly not a popular request.
Oh well...I simply thought it would help to prevent ping-ponging profiles where people take the information off the box. I also thought that accuracy was the ultimate goal here.
Guess I was wrong. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | There shouldn't be any ping-ponging, based on the cover, as the rules clearly tell us to "always verify the information directly from the DVD whenever possible."
As for accuracy, we are talking about...at most...21 seconds here. I have a hard time believing that the average user cares about being that accurate. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,819 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: I have a hard time believing that the average user cares about being that accurate. Have you asked them? Are you sure? Or it that just your opinion on the subject? How about looking at this sort of suggestion from the viewpoint of those that DO or MIGHT want the feature? As for the ping-ponging - I see it a LOT. Not everyone reads the rules as carefully as forum members. A lot of contributions I see are taking information from the box. Anyway - it's no biggie. I simply thought it might be something people would want and it's not a feature request I have seen come up. |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,917 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Lord Of The Sith: Quote: If we are going to add the seconds where will it stop? Even if you wanted to, you won't find a DVD player* on the planet that breaks down the time to a fraction of a second. * player, not an editor |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | To be able to calculate the original time for a PAL spedup movie it would be required to have the exact runtime, so count me in for accuraccy.
In addition a feature could be added which calculated the original time (by subtracting 4%) and showing this between brackets behind the DVD runtime. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands | | | Last edited: by Daddy DVD |
|
Registered: July 31, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,506 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote:
I don't believe I have ever heard 29 seconds refered to as being 'quite some away from' a specific time.
In the space of 60 seconds it's quite some way. In the grand scheme of things, no it's not. Quoting skipnet50: Quote: I would also like to s Ken come up with a way to deal with the multiple runtimes which we see with some of the multi-version films.
Skip I hadn't thought about that one and support this change as well. | | | Last edited: by Ardos |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: I would also like to s Ken come up with a way to deal with the multiple runtimes which we see with some of the multi-version films.
Skip Not to mention TV Series where you can have a good 4 to 8 episodes on a single disc! | | | Pete |
|