| Registered: April 14, 2007 |  Posts: 415 |
| | Posted: | | | | How is this different from (puppeteer), which is already in the rules? Both provide motion and emotion to an inanimate object.
We could just have a rule update to allow (motion-capture), although a new check box would be preferable for both. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 3,197 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting jmbox: Quote:
How is this different from (puppeteer), which is already in the rules? Both provide motion and emotion to an inanimate object.
Uh not really. A puppet is an inanimate object. A mo-cap actor is just that, a real flesh and blood actor acting out the scenes which are then animated. Even though some actors are quite wooden I wouldn't call them inanimate.  | | | | First registered: February 15, 2002 |
|
| Registered: April 14, 2007 | | Posts: 415 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting iPatsa: Quote:
Quoting jmbox:
Quote:
How is this different from (puppeteer), which is already in the rules? Both provide motion and emotion to an inanimate object.
Uh not really. A puppet is an inanimate object. A mo-cap actor is just that, a real flesh and blood actor acting out the scenes which are then animated. Even though some actors are quite wooden I wouldn't call them inanimate. I was referring to the on-screen digital representation of the character. |
|