Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,694 |
| Posted: | | | | Please change the install routine back to the way it used to be where you could designate your own home drive and directory for installing Profiler. Also, create ALL subdirectories under the main Profiler directory so that everything associated with Profiler is all in one place.
There is no advantage to putting some under "My Documents" on C drive, and it complicates troubleshooting if your trying to find or fix a problem. | | | John
"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice!" Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964 Make America Great Again! |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,635 |
| Posted: | | | | Separating program code from user data is "best practice" in the IT world, so I am glad to see that Invelos got on board.
If all programs would put their "user data" in the "My Documents" folder, then all I'd need to worry about backing up is that one folder.
Keep up the good work Ken! | | | Hal | | | Last edited: by hal9g |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,436 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree with Hal... If anything, it should be entirely configurable during installation...
I am a much happier camper ever since everything that relates to "MY DVD Profiler" (so yes, that includes the Layouts, etc. I use) is in one location which is included in my backups. | | | Achim [諾亞信; Ya-Shin//Nuo], a German in Taiwan. Registered: May 29, 2000 (at InterVocative) |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,217 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting hal9g: Quote: Separating program code from user data is "best practice" in the IT world, so I am glad to see that Invelos got on board. Exactly! Not to mention that it is necessary for multi-user operation-systems. cya, Mithi | | | Mithi's little XSLT tinkering - the power of XML --- DVD-Profiler Mini-Wiki |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,372 |
| Posted: | | | | I used to avoid the "my documents" folder like the plague. Something about my computer telling me where I was going to put my stuff that I did not like. Finally, as of last year, I gave up. I use it now. Microsoft won. Once I got used to it I find it to actually be mush easier and as was already pointed out it makes backing up a cinch. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 793 |
| Posted: | | | | And you can move the My Documents folder anywhere you want.
In fact, any time I decide to reinstall Windows, I just point the My Documents folder back to it's rightful place: on my F partition which contains my data. And it just takes 6-7 clicks to do! | | | Last edited: by RossRoy |
|
Registered: March 10, 2007 | Posts: 524 |
| Posted: | | | | The changes to installation were made to accomodate a seamless installation/running on Vista.
-Gerri | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative | | | Last edited: by Gerri Cole |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,029 |
| Posted: | | | | I think the current directory structure divided in document data, app data and program files is pretty intuitive. I have a minor quibble with the hard-coded "DVD Profiler" directory under "My Documents". That should be customizable. I remember some user who already had a folder with this name there and it got overwritten.
Edit: It could be argued that, due to their size, the OnlineList.dod/OnlineListSel.dod should be non-roaming data and therefore moved from "Application Data" to "Local Settings\Application Data". | | | Matthias | | | Last edited: by goodguy |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,459 |
| Posted: | | | | What if we were allowed to choose where the reports/layouts etc. went, like we are able to with the database? Or would that cause problems? |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 2,694 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Gerri Cole: Quote: The changes to installation were made to accomodate a seamless installation/running on Vista.
-Gerri You can have the default however you want it, but we ought to have the choice of putting it somewhere else if we wish to. Not every system is set up using the Microsoft defaults. If someone installs it somewhere else and has problems under Vista, that's their issue to deal with, not yours. | | | John
"Extremism in the defense of Liberty is no vice!" Senator Barry Goldwater, 1964 Make America Great Again! | | | Last edited: by Rifter |
|
Registered: March 15, 2007 | Posts: 366 |
| Posted: | | | | This is no different than putting programs in /usr/bin and data in /home/username in *nix. The practice has been around a long time, and I'm glad MS has finally gotten off there duff and made it a proper practice on Vista, even if no one is migrating to it. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,337 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting goodguy: Quote: It could be argued that, due to their size, the OnlineList.dod/OnlineListSel.dod should be non-roaming data and therefore moved from "Application Data" to "Local Settings\Application Data". Straight to the point. This "feature" really sucks on environments where roaming profiles are used with limited profile size. I have requested this change before. Correct place for those files is, as you said,"Local Settings\Application Data" that is not included to profile quota. |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,337 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting RossRoy: Quote: And you can move the My Documents folder anywhere you want. It's a "no go" with AD-controlled environments in many cases. |
|
Registered: May 11, 2007 | Posts: 249 |
| Posted: | | | | Im my case it is no problem to have the DVDProfiler database in "My Documents" as default, it is just that I want it in a sub-directory of "My Documents".
I would like to have the choice when installing / configuring the programme where the user data should be stored.
Personally I get a bit frustrated with programmes that just put directories directly under "My Documents" without asking me, and if I remove those directories just automatically recreate them the next time I use these programmes.
I like to be in control of how the "My Documents" folder is arranged. |
|