| Author |
Message |
| Registered: March 26, 2007 | | Posts: 196 |
| | Posted: | | | | I'd like to see contributions that consist of both cover scans and data be split into two that can be voted on separately. I'm seeing far too many votes that say "yes to data, no to scans", and it seems entirely unnecessary. |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 20,111 |
| | Posted: | | | | Ken must have had a reason for changing it to single profile/image contributions per submission, since that is how it was (split) over on Intervocative at one time. | | | | Corey |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 2,394 |
| | Posted: | | | | Since the screeners make the ultimate decision to approve or decline a contribution, and since they read the reasons for voting no (and sometimes yes), it seems to me that it doesn't matter whether we have a combined profile to vote on as we do now versus separate profiles (data and image) like we did in the old days at Invelos. Except for me not wanting to display adult images on my computer here at work (so I don't view contributions for titles i know or suspect to be adult heres) I would prefer to have to open only one combined contribution instead of 2. I get enough to vote on that I don't want to have to open two separate contributions. Just lazy, I guess. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,917 |
| | Posted: | | | | If the only no votes are for the scan, the screeners can still accept the profile and reject the scan. |
|
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 8,736 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr. Killpatient: Quote:
If the only no votes are for the scan, the screeners can still accept the profile and reject the scan. Correct! I've seen this happen several times. |
|
| Registered: March 10, 2007 | | Posts: 524 |
| | Posted: | | | | Just to validate, when we approve or decline your submission, we can approve (or decline) both or the profile and images separately. We look to the votes, so if you like one but not the other, then state that in the contribution votes. It helps alot to see that.
-Gerri | | | | Invelos Software, Inc. Representative |
|
| Registered: March 15, 2007 | | Reputation: |  Posts: 5,459 |
| | Posted: | | | | Thanks Gerri,
would it help you if we had 2 vote buttons in those situations so we can vote on them separately even though they're on the same contribution page? | | | | Last edited: by northbloke |
|
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 5,917 |
| | Posted: | | | | Along that thread North, I would put forth the following instead for submit images:
[ YES ] [ Optional reason ]
[ No - Both image and profile ] [ Reason ]
[ No - Image ] [ Reason ]
[ No - Profile ] [ Reason ]
Gets kinda cluttered. |
|
| Registered: March 26, 2007 | | Posts: 196 |
| | Posted: | | | | What's wrong with just having two profiles to vote on, one with just images and one with data? |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 2,394 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting smeehrrr: Quote:
What's wrong with just having two profiles to vote on, one with just images and one with data? More mouse clicks. You have to open two profiles (unless you ignore one of them) and I'm baslcally lazy. | | | Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001 |
|